Tuesday, 19 February 2008

2007_05_13_archive



Regolith Challenge Results

The Santa Maria Times reports that 4 teams were able to compete at the

actual Regolith Excavation Challenge, but none were able to win the

prize this year. There is also a picture of Buzz Aldrin looking on as

a competitor works with their robot on the challenge, and news in the

article about the ROBO Challenge for students.

The Houston Chronicle reports that Technology Ranch of Pismo Beach was

able to excavate over 65kg, but needed to reach 330 pounds to win. I'm

not sure why they used different units in the same article (I hope

they're not designing space probes on the side) but you can do the

conversion here. The Technology Ranch link shows that they plan to set

up a web site for their contender, so check back on that site later.

Their Technology Ranch blog is the one I posted on a few days ago,

where they noted that they decided to enter the challenge just a few

weeks ago. Good job for such a late start -- imagine what they (and

the other teams) will be able to do next year, with $750,000 on the

line instead of $250,000, a year more to work on their designs (and

sponsorships and so on), and the practical experience of having gone

through the challenge once already. Now ... how does one go about

getting some of that lunar simulant to help the development/testing

process?

Update: Here's the final report from the University of Missouri-Rolla

team. From their report it sounds possible that Launch Magazine will

have an article on the challenge. That's just my speculation - you'll

have to get the magazine to find out for sure!

New Scientist has an article with a couple pictures from the

challenge. It also has some details on what happened with each team.

One had problems with getting their excavator shipped across the

country to get to the challenge site. I seem to remember hearing about

another shipping problem at the 2006 X PRIZE Cup's Space Elevator

Games. New Scientist also has another article that also has 2

(different) pictures from the challenge. Both articles mention plans


No comments: