Thursday, 14 February 2008

carnival of space for thursday october



First up is Pamela Gay from Star Stryder with In Search of Alien Air.

She links to, and comments on, two papers that discuss the difficult

task of finding extra-solar planets.

I'm near-sighted and have trouble seeing past the end of my nose. It's

astounding to me that we can find planets around another star.

Ken Murphy sends along his article in The Space Review - The

Exploration of, and Conquest of, the Moon!.

In the 1950s, people were beginning to realize, as rockets

penetrated further and further past the threshold of space, that

perhaps Goddard had been on to something, and perhaps a trip to our

Moon was possible. To help popularize this idea in the freest

bastions of the free world, the US and UK, two teams of authors and

illustrators set out to create books that would be accessible to

everyone and explained the most basic principles of what would be

involved. The results couldn't be more different, perhaps

reflecting the deeper cultural lessons, but also differing in the

scope of their ambitions.

Moving outward from the Moon to Mars and the Asteroid Belt we have

Darnell Clayton at Colony Worlds with Colonizing Ceres Before Mars

Could Save The Red Planet.

Whether or not our species actually settles the red planet is

highly questionable. Unlike Earth's Moon, Mars lacks major

resources of any kind that would make colonizing the planet

worthwhile. Unless those crimson deserts can provide some return on

investment, it may be wiser to turn Mars into a penal colony, than

attempting to recreate the world into a second home.But humanity

may be able to justify settling Mars by diverting its attention

towards the asteroid belt first--and the key towards conquering the

asteroid belt, as well as Mars may lie upon the dwarf world Ceres.

The choice of which to settle first is a Cereous matter ...

Stuartatk at Cumbrian Sky talks about one of our happy robot pals who

have gone before us and made tire ruts on the surface of Mars in

Tracks

A couple of days ago an image flashed up on my screen and I

literally froze as I looked at it...

[pic?id=5850BEyZzhu*teXWpWRAxfgr0y6RRGyQe6*Av4xQp5Fd3Ig=&size=m

]

It wasn't anything anyone else would consider to be "special" or

"amazing"; just a grainy, black and white picture of Opportunity's

tracks through the inches-high dust dune running around the edge of

Victoria Crater, but it triggered something in me, a reaction, a

response, that refused to go away. Just two notches in an

undulating, close horizon, but it made my breath catch in my

throat, because it occurred to me that that picture was the latest

in a long line of images showing nothing less than Mankind's

progress and development - if not Evolution itself.

Come to think of it one of the more interesting memories I have

growing up is looking at wagon wheel ruts carved into rock near my

grandma's place in Oregon - ruts made by pioneers on the Oregon trail.

TopSpace at RLV and Space Transport News links to and comments on a

USA Today article about Eric Anderson and Space Adventures.

These people (ISS tourists) are not part of a market study. They

are hard data that prove the appeal of space tourism (sorry, I

prefer that term). Furthermore, their "regular folk" backgrounds

indicate that a similar percentage of people in lower net worth

strata would go if the ticket prices came within their reach.

With respect five of anything doesn't prove much - the sample size is

too small. We can be hopeful but ought to be wary of inferring from

ratty data.

Speaking of cynics ... it's Shubber from Space Cynics about the ISS in

Slim Pickings.

Thomas Pickens III seems to think that the future opportunity for

making the ISS that success that we all deep down know it can be is

to get the pharmaceutical industry to line up to use it... if only

they knew how valuable it was!

I'd be wary of using an expensive one of a kind government facility

that costs a bundle to get to as well.

Louise Riofrio at Babe In The Universe links pop culture and Niels

Bohr in STARDUST and Niels Bohr.

STARDUST is based on a graphic novel by Neil Gaiman. A star (Claire

Danes) falls to Earth in human form and can't return to the sky.

Along the way she encounters lovestruck Tristan Thorne (Charlie

Cox) and pirate Captain Shakespeare (Robert DeNiro), who captures

lightning in his airship. She is pursued by Prince Septemus (Mark

Strong) and a wicked witch (Michelle Pfeiffer). The villains wish

to cut out the star's glowing heart to gain her secret of eternal

life.

The eternal life of stars has been a mystery that life on Earth's

surface depends on. According to standard models, life should not

have evolved here at all because when the Solar System was forming

the Sun was only 75% as bright. Earth's average temperature would

have been 15 degrees below zero Celsius, frozen solid. This can't

be true, for geology and the fossil record say that Earth had

liquid water and life when models say it was frozen solid. This

conflict with observations is the Faint Young Sun paradox.

Paul Gilster at Centauri Dreams weighs in with Remembering Robert

Bussard. As you are no doubt aware of Robert Bussard passed on last

week. His work on fusion may yet bear fruit - and we'll owe him a

great deal if it does. But we should also remember him for other work

it's the ramjet that I return to as I think about him. If you

collect classic papers, as I do, here's one for you: Bussard's

"Galactic Matter and Interstellar Spaceflight" in Acta Astronautica

6 (1960), pp. 179-94. Imagine a scoop created by a magnetic field

that sucks in interstellar hydrogen ionized by a forward-firing

laser. The result is fed into a fusion reactor. Get the vehicle up

to about six percent of light speed and you could light that

engine, with presumably amazing results.

There are worse ways to get around the galaxy.

Greg Laden at Evolution (catchy tag line, Greg) opines that Sputnik

was The greatest thing that ever happened to America.

If you were raised in a society in which there is an evil enemy

that you are convinced intends to arrive some day on your country's

shores, take over your government, impose a new social order, marry

your sister, and so on, then when this evil foreign government

sends the first warning shot in this war and it is an unprecedented

and amazing feat of science, then suddenly you love science. You

pay taxes to fund science. Your idolize science. You start

demanding that science comes to the rescue. One way to do this is

to fund science, fund higher education, build up the universities.

Maybe? What do you think?

Space Files reports that the UFO seen during Apollo mission thing has

been resolved.

One of the legends of the space age is that during their flight to

the moon, Apollo astronauts saw UFOs, or objects they couldn't

identify but which were obviously floating in space somewhere close

to them. This is rather a fact than a legend, as Buzz Aldrin

confirmed it in numerous interviews.

I mean we know this it never hurts to point this out. Me, I think that

it's incredible that we assume there are aliens savvy enough to cross

thousands of light years, hide their presence from us but .. dumb

enough to pull an oopsie and show themselves to the guys aboard

Apollo?

Thanks for reading and thanks for contributing!

Here are instructions for contributing - see you next week.


No comments: