Pyongyang as virtual space
Fiction Pyongyang, curated by Joseph Grima together with Stefano Boeri
and Armin Linke
Pyongyang's sinister landscapes are not to be quickly dismissed as
the tangible proof of the existence of a "kingdom of evil." As we
pointed out, one can perceive something familiar in them, an eerie
familiarity to an eye accustomed to the imagery of western science
fiction. It's as though in the aftermath of the 1952 bombing of
Pyongyang (an entire city razed to the ground seven years after
Hiroshima and Dresden -- have we all forgotten?), someone like
George Orwell or Ridley Scott decided to create, without a hint of
irony, Western culture's worst dystopia. It is impossible to remain
indifferent to the bizarre collection of architectural caricatures
built by the North Korean nomenklatura. They created a city
populated by automata unable to exercise their free will, the
incarnation of an isolated absolute regime that is nevertheless
capable of unscrupulous recourse to the symbolic language of
Western democracies.
--from an interview with Stefano Boeri in Artkrush
I know next to nothing about the capital of North Korea, but hey--that
describes, quite literally, just about everyone else in the world,
too. Finally, a subject on which the vast, vast majority of people can
be equally knowledgeable.
Seeing as I find metafictions intellectually appealing, it seems only
natural that a city like Pyongyang would attract my attention. The
thing is, unlike remote natural places like the bottom of the ocean or
restricted spaces like Area 51 (whose Wikipedia entry is longer than
that for Pyongyang), Pyongyang is ostensibly a public space whose
official population is literally a state secret and about whose metro
system (see below) the only absolutely certain things known of it are
that it exists and people use it. Where Boeri sees a
slightly-offputting familiarity in the city's physical space, his
video suggests something else: something close to the city-as-blue
screen. I don't have it at hand, so I can't quote verbatim, but in the
course of an essay on David Lynch, David Foster Wallace says something
to the effect that the strange thing about Los Angeles is that it
looks exactly the way you expect it to look. Personally speaking, I
can attest to thinking the same thing about New York when I first
visited there, the only real surprise being that, beneath all that
asphalt, Manhattan is gently rolling. Pyongyang, by contrast, looks
any way you care to imagine it. It is as close to a virtual space as a
city of somewhere around 2 million people is likely to be.
Some cases in point: Via Andrew Sullivan, this article in Esquire
about the focal point of much of the video above, the uncompleted
Ryugyong Hotel. As you can see, it looks like the Dark Lord Sauron's
idea of a destination hotel. The article reveals that this building is
regarded by the government as being so hideous (not to mention
embarrassingly uncompleted) that it regularly airbrushes it out of its
photos of the Pyongyang skyline.
The Esquire article led me to Ryugyong.org, a site where visitors can
(or could because, analogously to the hotel, it's no longer being
supported) claim space in a 3-D model of the building and install
projects of their own design in that space. The idea is reminiscent of
Second Life--but, again, it's curious that this site's space is now
abandoned, just like that of the hotel it's modeled on. It's fun to
speculate that Pyongyang just has that effect on those who deign to
engage with it, even in the blogosphere.
And finally there is the site I visited a couple of years ago which
first piqued my curiosity about Pyongyang, this unofficial site
describing the Pyongyang Metro. The first two paragraphs from the
"Statistics" page are actually pretty typical--read closely and ponder
the implications of what it's saying:
The Pyongyang Metro consists of two public lines, north-south
Chollima (named for a mythical flying horse, the Korean Pegasus)
and east-west Hyoksin (Renovation); there are also believed to be
other undisclosed lines for government use. The total length of the
public system is probably around 22.5 km, of which the Chollima
line is about 12 km and the Hyoksin line about 10.
Like most North Korean statistics, this figure may be inaccurate,
as it has been reported since the mid-1980s, and may not include
the nearly 2 km between Ponghwa and Puhung, opened in 1987; if this
is so the system is approximately 24 km. Some sources claim 34 km,
of which the Chollima line is 14 km and the Hyoksin line 20 km,
however this figure may be arrived at by adding the original 24 km
mentioned above and a planned 10-km extension to Mangyongdae, and
thus likely does not refer to the system's current length.
And, further down the same page:
Maps of the system are not widely distributed, and physical
locations of stations are not marked on street maps; the brochure
"The Pyongyang Metro" does not include one. . . . As an economy
measure [due to chronic electricity shortages], the entire service
is said to close on the first Monday of each month, and perhaps
more often. Station lights are dim or switched off altogether, and
many sources report that trains in tunnels are often caught by
power cuts, forcing passengers to wait in the darkness, sometimes
for hours.
Indeed, whether the Metro is in regular service at all is not
entirely certain. Practically the only non-North Korean
eyewitnesses to Metro use are the visitors given the showcase ride
on the system.
I have no big wind-up to all this, aside from the obvious: all cities
have their own character, but beyond that they are all the same in
that they are inarguably public spaces, a heteroglossic space whose
meaning is contested (at times happily, at times less so) by various
state and community interests. Those notions are so familiar as to go
unremarked . . . unless or until one bumps into a place like
Pyongyang.
No comments:
Post a Comment